Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Irwin's Australia Zoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 21:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Irwin's Australia Zoo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks sources that indicate notability, and this show may have never broadcast. The only one I can locate is mentioned in a dead link, but you can see the excerpt copied here in the top message, complete with the link to the source. I can't find the information in the source in Archive.org. TheGGoose (talk) 13:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject lacks notability. All I'm finding is information on the Australia Zoo itself, which already has an article. Fuzchia (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject lacks independent notability. If something could be sourced, it could be added to the zoo's article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's nothing to suggest independent notability and it may not have been well broadcased because it seems the best I found was this Hollywood Reporter from 2008 announcing it. At best, this would be best mentioned at the family's article. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as insufficiently notable. Also note grammatical error: should have been The Irwins' (or Irwins's) Australia Zoo. Quis separabit? 15:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.