Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Internal Market (Story)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against redirect. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 06:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Internal Market (Story) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neither reference provided gives any indication of the subject's notability: the first is a link to a place where the story may be purchased, and the second provides a link to download the story in PDF format. Either better Arabic sources need to be provided or we cannot host an article like this. A loose necktie (talk) 13:03, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- DeleteA short story with absolutely no evidence of any impact or cultural relevance, doesn't even have an Arabic WP page. Fails WP:GNG. BTW, Choukri's notable 'For Bread Alone' doesn't have a page, why would a little known short story? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Mohamed Choukri. I have removed the plot summary as a copyvio (it was a direct copy-paste of the reference cited). With or without the plot summary, this does not appear notable for a stand-alone article. I would take no issue with a redirect to article about the author. Otherwise, I would support deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 17:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.