Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Integral University in Paris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Integral University in Paris[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable coverage. While there is coverage (see this edition of the ILR) I can find literally nothing else. Ironholds (talk) 02:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Putting it delicately, this appears to be just a proposal for a project (possibly machine translated, at least in part?). External references are thin on the ground - perhaps more in French for "Université Intégrale" - but there again, pages like [1] are yet again announcing the project more than anything else. A far more concise text already appears on the biog page for its founder Michel Saloff Coste, so I can't seen anything being lost by deleting this page. AllyD (talk) 22:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the many article claims.N2e (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete From the reference , it seems to be an actually existing series of seminars being given under this name, which is a little on the pompous side for something at this stage of organization. In the absence of third party sources, it is impossible to tell the significance. I am also to a considerable degree bothered by the content of the article, which says that they basically formed it because they did not like their coverage in Wikipedia. I'm therefore inclined to regard this as wholly promotional, and a possible G11. DGG ( talk ) 06:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.