Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Holy Quran and Science Conference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Holy Quran and Science Conference

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This WP:FRINGE conference does not seem to have generated any independent notice. I cannot find anybody who is not connected to the conference who has noticed it. Thus it fails to be notable enough for Wikipedia. jps (talk) 20:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I looked for independent coverage and couldn't find anything substantial, either. XOR'easter (talk) 02:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [Article Author] The following are independent newspapers or online journals that carried the news or references of the Holy Qur'an and Science conference. These are referenced in the article as well:

1. [1]

2. [2]

3. Can Pak Voice Canada newspaper: [3]

4. [4]

5. [5], [6]

6. [7], [8]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabeelrana (talk • contribs) 05:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are not, to my understanding, the high-quality independent notice we would require. You need people who are not connected to this conference to indicate the notability. jps (talk) 12:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1 and 4 are event listings. 2 is an announcement by a participant in the conference. 3 is not in-depth reporting, and it is from a publication whose editorial standards we have no information about. 5 appears to be from an organization sponsoring the event. 6 are the Muslim Times posting videos by the Chief Editor of the Muslim Times, who participated in the conference. These sources do not establish notability. XOR'easter (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The reports and coverage by media about the conference will always by by those who attended or participated in the conference. That is absolutely logical. How would someone report about it if he/she did not attend the conference in anyway. I am looking for more references as well testimonials of attendees and of scientists who presented research papers in the past conferences. I will post such references as well. Nabeelrana (talk) 22:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: (yes, I worry about everything) Context/background indicating proper care is needed: Persecution of Ahmadis Shenme (talk) 05:55, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sources found appear to be connected to the topic, not independent. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 19:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent source. — Mathieudu68 ^talk 21:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable independant sources. -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 12:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is significant coverage in Can-Pak Voice, but that appears to be a monthly community newsletter. Other than that, there's very little to use to write more than a one-liner. Bearian (talk) 00:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.