Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Holy Fire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep - good work, people. DS (talk) 06:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Holy Fire[edit]
- The Holy Fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, only refs are from the band's site, the label's site and a page promoting the band. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No third party sources. Ancemy (talk) 23:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- treelo radda 00:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep meets the usual standard. I see no reason to deviate from that here. WilyD 13:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Maybe I'm going totally nuts, but [6] Google search seemed to turn up mostly refs to this article. Perhaps after deletion, we should redirect there as well. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 00:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.