Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hollow Reed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 09:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Hollow Reed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Passing mention in sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a historical business no longer operating. It passes WP:COMPANY significant coverage with "ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization" after 1981 closing with recent, ongoing coverage from multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources including statewide. BrikDuk (talk) 10:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrewman327: Could you list some of those sources? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.