Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The History of the Galaxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 00:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The History of the Galaxy

Not published in English, author article also AfD Wtshymanski (talk) 23:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Russian-language literature is just as notable as English-language literature, other things being equal. --Eastmain (talk) 01:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no valid reason given in Nomination Statement for deletion. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 07:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep invalid nomination, WP:SNOW? Fosnez (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Certainly invalid nom. BTW, Chronolegion has an undoubted contribution merit in this theme. --Brand спойт 14:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - So just what *does* get excluded from Wikipedia? Is any blood-and-thunder purveyor of rack-filler paperbacks also encyclopedia worthy? Now, I like SF, but it's not for nothing that Sturgeon's Law was promulgated by an SF writer. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I wont comment for what others feel is in/out, but to me it is a lot about the Reason that something gets excluded/deleted. If something must go, at least make it for an acceptable reason. The reasoning in this perticular (and some other recent) AfD just does not reach even a basic level of reasonability. AfD is only the skelleton of a structure. The Nominator has to put the Meat onto it. The community gets to chew it over. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the rationales described above. John254 03:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.