Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hills Have Eyes III (2008 Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7, only one author has made significant contributions to the article and has requested deletion (see last comment on this AfD). —David Eppstein (talk) 06:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hills Have Eyes III (2008 Film)

After having the proposed deletion tags removed several times by the article's creator, I've decided to create a consensus. I propose that this film article should be deleted because there is no sources or any other official information to say that the film is in production. If the film is announced, and there is reliable sources, the article may then be recreated. I have found not one shred of evidence to suggest the film is being made, which violates WP:NOTFILM and WP:CRYSTAL, and the article creator can seem to give no official source. Therefore the article should be deleted.--EclipseSSD (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NFF/WP:CRYSTAL. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 21:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per nom. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing to indicate this film is actually being made, certainly with a 2008 release. No prejudice against recreation at a later date if and when such a film is actually announced or released. 23skidoo (talk) 21:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per 23skiddoo. X Marx The Spot (talk) 21:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 22:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the notability guidelines for future films; a search engine test shows only rumblings back in February 2007. If there's any verifiable coverage about this possible project, it should go to a film series article. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom ukexpat (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As the creator of this article, i actually now think it should be deleted. I created it because the wikipedia article for Fox Atomic Studios said it was under production and set to be released in 2008 or 2009. That's the only source i had and it should be deleted. I've already placed a section in the Hills Have Eyes Series about an upcoming remake. LukeTheSpook (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.