Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Groovesmiths

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 14:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Groovesmiths[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to have reliable sourcing in order to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Kelly ^hi! 12:46, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep added some refs including reviews, notable per WP:NBAND.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this seems convincing enough, will need familiar attention. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to satisfy WP:NBAND. Dan arndt (talk) 08:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, needs work but seems to qualify for WP:NBAND. Insert CleverPhrase Here 00:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.