Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Razooly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Razooly[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very little credible claim of significance. The one reference does not refer to the subject. Google search identifies that the subject is real, that is, that someone uses this moniker, but that is about it. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of refs means non notable. Not sure how this ended up in the artists sort.104.163.140.193 (talk) 07:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as my nom.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.