Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gospel Center of Norway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Gospel Center of Norway[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not convinced of this organization's importance after a Google/Google News search. Seems non-notable. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 16:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, what would Google News provide about that? Possibly merge to articles about founders (but they don't exist yet). Geschichte (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, only reason I bring up Google News is because it was brought up in SoWhy's CSD decline, "see also Google News/Books hits for this subject." This is to acknowledge that I looked at Google News/Books and the article still seems NN. If it were to merge anywhere, Lunner might be a good location. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 16:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DElete -- It looks like a NN rehab to me, run by two NN people (NN as no article). GNews gave me no hits. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are woefully unknowledgeable about research if Google News is your only source for references. Geschichte (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Geschichte, please understand how unlikely it is that any editor at Wikipedia in English has ever heard of this Norwegian drug rehabilitation canter. A drug rehabilitation center can be notable according to our standards: WP:GNG. To pass those standards, there would have to be sources such as articles in newspapers, or materail about this center in books or in scholarly articles. I invite you to provide such sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of sources. But feel free to flag me to reconsider should anyone suceed in sourcing it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and CORPDEPTH. Probably NONPROFIT as well. I would be up for a redirect to a founder but they don't have pages.L3X1 (distænt write) 01:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.