Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Go Set

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 21:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Go Set[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Given this article's long time on Wikipedia, that there is a {{Template:The Go Set}} and the band's extensive listing of performances in off-Wikipedia (reliable or not) third party sources - I have WP:BEFORE'd - it would appear to me much better to start a deletion discussion than to speedily delete this article, as was requested. I would have expected some coverage of this Melbourne-based band in either The Age or Herald Sun, that city's two main newspapers, but have found none. Does this article pass the WP:GNG and/or WP:BAND tests for notability? Discuss. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is defintely not very much but it is not zero either? But does not help I think? Aoziwe (talk) 11:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes IRS are not jumping out at you but they are there, for example [1] [2] [3] all of which are non commercial sites / "government" and would be highly reliable. I found these rather easily so would assume if I looked longer there would be more. Two of these have relative depth. Aoziwe (talk) 11:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take some time to do a deeper search later and i-vote then, but for now, I'm not sure about the sources you found. [4] is a press release. [5] is a user submitted site. So those two are not good sources. I'm not sure about [6] but it reads suspiciously promotional. ShelbyMarion (talk) 22:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems to be plenty of coverage: [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. --Michig (talk) 18:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. They have released more than two albums, they have toured both Australia and internationally. Reliable sources, with substantial coverage, have now been added – more are mentioned above.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.