Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ghost (Band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. NAC. Joe Chill (talk) 00:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Ghost (Band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This band is deliberately not notable, it doesn't meet WP:N and WP:BAND. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 23:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Members of band are not of any importance. Band has little following that would indicate the need for a page.keystoneridin! (talk) 23:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1, not only for the 2 reviews from Pitchfork Media & Punknews.org already on the page before this was tagged for AfD, but also for a review at Stylus Magazine here, more at Punknews.org here, and here. A critics star rating at MSN Music here, as well as other mentions here, here, and here. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 17:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sufficient independent coverage for notability - needs expansion rather than deletion.--Michig (talk) 07:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 15:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Just about meets notability but needs some expansion, or at least an infobox. Rafablu88 17:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Needs work to expand and include more references, but the sources I can find convince me that they were notable in the Chicago punk scene. Fences&Windows 19:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The band wasn't very popular, but they did receive coverage, and what is in the article now, coupled with other articles I found with a quick search, is enough to satisfy WP:N. Also, as a note, I've renamed the article to The Ghost (band) to fix the capitalization. Tim meh (review me) 22:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Since to me this is heading towards a keep, I've started formatting the article, starting with an infobox. I'll add in all the associated ref's after I've had breakfast. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 23:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.