Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gathering (Williams)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 17:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Gathering (Williams) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no claims to notability. Google searches have not turned up much in the way of reviews either. The article currently has three references: the first would not work for me; the second is more about the artist than the artwork; the third is little more than a database entry. I am unsure whether there are any specific notability guidelines for paintings, but to me this seems to fail WP:GNG. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with the above about references; maybe the artists favorite among his works, but I see no potential content that cannot be added to the artists's biog. I've added the image to the biog...what use is an artist biog without a single example of their work??TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 21:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.