Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gardens (Pastoral Station)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. Note that I have moved the article to the title "The Garden (pastoral station), as suggested by Gnangarra herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Gardens (Pastoral Station)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Delete~~-~~The place is nothing notable!!! Dearth of source!!~~ Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-The article has enough sources to be allowed without a doubt!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 12:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations can allow more than 27 minutes from the time the "no sources" tag is placed on an article to the time of opening of an AfD. WP:BEFORE C2 states, "If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article." Unscintillating (talk) 06:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems to be a random property. I've found stuff like this, but that's all I found, really. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a quick search returns reference in National media[1], a book about the station from 1987 Grant, A. R., (Arthur Russell); Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory (1987), Pastoral land survey of the Hale plain : The Garden Station, Soil and Land Resources Unit, Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory, retrieved 7 October 2016{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Add to that all mention fact that part of the station was excised to create the Trephina Gorge site of Arrernte people rock art, to me this looks very much like a notable topic. Unlike mayor Australian cities and some east caost country towns references to NT subjects arent going to be digital. Gnangarra 14:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- note for closing admin the Station should be at The Garden (Pastoral Station) not The Gardens (Pastoral Station) as an errant s Gnan garra 14:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it used to be part of Undoolya station which was the first legal cattle station on the NT. It's very historic in terms of the development of the NT. Just give us a chance to keep working on the page. NT pages take longer to build. Not many online resources! User:tenniscourtisland User_talk:tennuscourtisland 08:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article was sourced a day after it was created. Additional sourcing has been provided by Gnangarra. Unscintillating (talk) 06:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep self evident from sources, notable and sourced easily JarrahTree 13:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sourced now, was too quickly nominated. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The addition of sources that I didn't have access to makes it clear this is notable. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the sources indicated above. Speedy tagging within 13 minutes of article creation is not helpful and only serves as WP:BITE. --Oakshade (talk) 19:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.