Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ganymede Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I note the article was improved between the nomination and now, so we now have more of a proper article with clear assertions to notability. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Ganymede Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable book I+delete+things+alot (talk) 00:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional delete: Unless significant coverage is found in WP:RS to show notability, this needs to go. I trust the closing admin to look at this condition and interpret my !vote correctly. Fiddle Faddle 15:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article now has adequate substantiation of its notability. While ultimately, it might be better to have an article on the Cold as Ice (trilogy), rather than separate articles; right now, although this is the second in the trilogy, it is the most developed article on the three books. --Bejnar (talk) 23:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and speedy close. The ISFDB page for this novel lists enough reviews to establish the coverage that demonstrates notability. The nom has apparently ignored the requirements of WP:BEFORE and displays a curious interest in deleting the works of a rather notable author. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.