Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Firestone Direct Sugar Shack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Mandsford 03:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Firestone Direct Sugar Shack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. 2 gnews hits [1], for a TV show that has existed for over 4 years says it's hardly watched or notable. LibStar (talk) 06:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -gadfium 01:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, almost trivial. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 03:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.