Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fetish List

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete this eyesore, since the creator freely admits it is complete bollocks from beginning to end. Just zis Guy you know? 10:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Fetish List

NN, unreferenced, and plain - oh lord knows how to describe it. Long. Bored kid in a school lesson. Coz it says so. Fiddle Faddle 12:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, if not speedy. It's nonsense. -- Mikeblas 13:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Couldn't quite work up to a "speedy". Happy to have it speedied, though. it is... well, no real words describe it. Long. That's the word. Actually it's pretty much vanity for a group of giggling kids. Fiddle Faddle 13:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. From article: " The list has been seen by many to be an immature and silly thing." Add me to that list. PJM 13:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; not patent nonsense but WP:NFT for sure. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. -- Mr Stephen 13:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy G1. Nominated accordingly. Tevildo 13:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, the article is not patent nonsense. Please remember that CSD G1 does not include poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, badly translated material, implausible theories or hoaxes. --TBCTaLk?!? 13:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per WP:NFT and WP:HOAX--TBCTaLk?!? 13:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Zos 18:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy to AlanMarsden. GassyGuy 19:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. (aeropagitica) (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete or Speedy. Whatever the hell you do, don't userfy it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not that you asked, but just to explain myself the same, while this page is certainly far from article criteria, it does describe a bit about the creator and his personality, which is more than I can say for other user pages deemed acceptable, like this one, for example. I certainly won't be weeping when this is deleted, but I thought I'd throw the suggestion out just the same. GassyGuy 06:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Complete scrotum content. Danny Lilithborne 01:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you mean WP:BALLS don't you? Fiddle Faddle 09:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete It was conceived and written by Alan Marsden out of boredom in a 4th year maths class at Bell Baxter High School, Scotland. Tantamount to confession. SM247^{My Talk} 01:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not sure where "4th year maths" falls agewise, but all I can picture from this article is a bunch of sniggering thirteen-year-old boys clustered around a computer in the back of the school library in study hall. Opabinia regalis 03:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, absolute textbook example of WP:NFT. Also fails WP:NOR, WP:HOAX and WP:BALLS. Also fails WP:V and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AH-HA!!!!!! Yeah I know, I'm just a time waster. A big fat Wiki time waster. The article's complete crap. It will not be wikified - EVER. It is a gargantuan slice of irrelevant nonsense. Thank you for the time you wasted.

Regards, Alan.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanmarsden (talk • contribs)

Since that was the creator can we speedy it, please? Fiddle Faddle 20:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Yeah, I agree with the rest. This makes no sense. It seems to be nothing but a random list just to get attention from people looking at the "Long Pages" list(like me). --RandomOrca2 00:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete' - as per everyone above, Wiki:not and common sense. Amists 15:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per - well, everybody really. WP:NFT Just zis Guy you know? 10:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.