Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Expansion of Health Sector in Saudi Arabia.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Speedy Close , as the equivalent to our customary speedy deletion of articles by blocked users , CSD G5. This does not prevent anyone from proposing a merge, or just going ahead and merging. . DGG ( talk ) 01:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Expansion of Health Sector in Saudi Arabia.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research. Garyseven (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nominator. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 03:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an essay. If there is relevant information that is well-sourced, it could be added to Healthcare in Saudi Arabia or somesuch article. --Juno the pregnant little girl (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't original research. The historical part for instance is based on this WHO document. This is just an awfully formatted article on a too narrow topic. Presumably nobody is going to fix it given that it has been in this sorry state for almost a year. I propose a redirect to Healthcare in Saudi Arabia, and leave a note on talk there, in case some volunteer can be found later to use/fix this material. Tijfo098 (talk) 23:16, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oddly enough, the nominator has been indef blocked as vandalism-only account. [1], and "Juno the pregnant little girl" as sockpuppet: [2] Tijfo098 (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.