Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Essential

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Essential[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources for this compilation album. Only sources are primary. The fact that several albums in this series have certified platinum means that those individual albums are notable but the series isn't. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16 Biggest Hits, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Hits, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection — same reasoning holds up here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can easily be converted to a list of The Essential albums or a disambiguation page. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 10:32, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - for the same reasons as found in the AfDs for similar series as linked in this nomination. Individual albums within the series can stand or fall on their own merits, but the series has not achieved notability as an entity separate from the albums within it. Also, the disambig list idea is a pretty good one. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.