Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The E.N.D. (The Energy Never Dies) (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 06:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The E.N.D. (The Energy Never Dies)[edit]

AfDs for this article:
The E.N.D. (The Energy Never Dies) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete (without prejudice for recreation) per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:V, Wikipedia:There is no deadline. An album title has been announced, for an album that will be released in September (November?). Nothing else is (verifiably) known at present. At present, the article will serve as nothing more than a magnet for blog/messageboard-sourced rumours (which then have a habit of becoming gospel and spreading like wildfire once mentioned on WP) and/or hoaxers - as can already be seen with the 'producers' section in the infobox. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete per above - It will probably be necessary to have an article on this in the future, but I don't think it could be useful now until some verifiable information is released. Firestorm (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep.(neutral) per the consensus keep result of last time (ran from Oct. 12-29, 2007). R. Baley (talk) 07:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC) edited to add: after poking around a little, I couldn't find a mention, or an expected release on the BEP official website. Without prejudice towards re-creation should more sources be found, I'm changing my 'keep' to neutral with a lean towards delete (sorry JuJube) R. Baley (talk) 22:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Album DEFINITLY needs to stay. It is an album by a GREAT populuar successful band featuring one of the worlds best Fergie. How could anyone delete this? An album has been confirmed and a month for release and more information would be coming soon as it is being released in just over 7 months that is enough information. And people would go to the Black Eyed Peas or Fergie articles and click on The E.N.D. link and that would promote the album as this is a populuar website. I would be VERY upset if this article was deleted. I am already angry that is even being considered for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.188.247 (talk) 07:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reply to anon: You can increase the chances of an article being kept by adding references (magazines or newspapers would be best). If you find additional references and don't know how to add them to the article, just ask anyone for help. I am sorry to say however that being upset will carry about zero weight as far as comments go. R. Baley (talk) 07:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL @ "Fergie" and "the best" being used in the same sentence. JuJube (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BLACKKITE 16:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep per R. Baley. JuJube (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • There's really no info other than the name of the album. Changing my vote to Delete. JuJube (talk) 11:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom under WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL, or we'll be setting a precedent for people to have articles speculating about all manner of things. If and when the album comes out, the article can be re-created. Until then, by definition, it's all unverifiable speculation. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 20:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. and AlasdairGreen27. If and when it's released and becomes notable, an article can be created. This is a classic WP:CRYSTAL case. JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I've had a brief google search and can find nothing on it that's not from the BEPs forum - none of whose posts I can read! There's nothing on it in their news pages so I can only assume the title is speculation. Starfighter Pilot (talk) 20:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_E.N.D._(The_Energy_Never_Dies)_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1138838896"