Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dragon Queen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 & all that fun stuff (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 16:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Dragon Queen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Novel with no refs that has been tagged for notability since 2008 Wgolf (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)~~withdrawn[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NBOOK. It's been reviewed by Publishers Weekly[1] and apparently School Library Journal, at least according to Amazon.com. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw-Okay does look notable enough then! Wgolf (talk) 20:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.