Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dooley and Pals Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Dooley and Pals Show[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without explanation by a date-change vandal. Original rationale, by Liz (talk · contribs), was:

Not notable children's TV program from the 1990s that has been repackaged multiple times and syndicated through regional networks.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and United States of America. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would presume a show that was "repackaged multiple times and syndicated" is notable. And the article says "This first Dooley series won three Emmys" which (if verifiable) should be more than sufficient to demonstrate the relevance of the topic. However, I can't find any sourcing beyond (unlinkable) YouTube episode videos and a few trivial mentions -- which is insufficient to write an article. Walt Yoder (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per sources 3 and 6 provided by Cunard. Walt Yoder (talk) 16:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Tiffany, Laura (2004-10-31). "The Dooley and Pals Show Vols. 1–3". Video Store Magazine. Vol. 26, no. 45. p. 36. EBSCOhost 14933353.
  The article notes: ""The Dooley and Pals Show" is a well-produced educational show that blends live action, music, puppetry and cartoons, and is full of warm and cuddly lessons. Each episode has a unifying theme — like home-sickness, how families differ or welcoming a new kid — but lots of other lessons are packed in. In one episode, Dooley receives advice on his insomnia; letter carrier Ms. Z introduces the group to the letter "S"; a puppet is taught that "no" isn't a magic word; a song helps kids keep track of their things; and even the Spanish phrase for "sweet dreams" is slipped in. The show can be an exhausting watch if you don't have a toddler-sized attention span, but it's perfect for its core audience. The songs are catchy, the dance moves (performed by ages 7 to 11) are easy to follow, and the many lessons are age-appropriate. "
2. Berman, Pat (2001-02-11). "S.C. ETV shows off its technology (and Dooley) during family day". The State. Archived from the original on 2023-03-28. Retrieved 2023-03-28 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: "But the big "D" as in Dooley was the draw of the day. The antennaed, pink-faced Dooley, described by a TV writer as "a happy, bug-like critter from another planet" can be seen daily in a before- and after-school children's program called "Dooley and Pals Show." Smart Cat and Arthur, two other popular characters, also drew crowds. But children willingly waited in a line that snaked through the studio corridors, out the door and down the block for the chance to have their picture taken with Dooley."
3. Abbott, Jim (2000-06-29). "An acute case of Barney burnout influences new preschooler show" (pages 1 and 2). Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2023-03-28. Retrieved 2023-03-28 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: "If Dooley, which airs at 7 a.m. Sundays on WMFE-Channel 24, really is hipper than Barney, he uses similar techniques to reach young minds. Produced by Orlando-based Victory Entertainment Corp., Dooley features plenty of music, a cast of fresh-faced youngsters and themes about friendship, responsibility and learning. ... Each episode features a visit from the local mail carrier (Orlando actor DaVonda Simmons) and guidance from a nurturing mother, played by Orlando actor Ginger Lee McDermott. While many children's shows and prime-time sitcoms portray adults as clueless comedic foils, Dooley uses them as role models."
4. Sitarz, Joseph (2000-11-22). "Dooley to make parade debut". The Index-Journal. Archived from the original on 2023-03-28. Retrieved 2023-03-28 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: ""The Dooley and Pals Show" is the popular children's show on public television stations around the country. Dooley was created by Greenwood's Mark Riddle with Gary Zeidenstein. ... "The Dooley and Pals Show" is crafted around the concept that education through entertainment and discovery. The show used music, dancing with highly-educational life lessons and pro-social skills. The show is geared for 2-5 year olds."
5. "Dooley is Jerry's pal". The Index-Journal. 2000-09-02. Retrieved 2023-03-28 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: ""The Dooley and Pals Show" is a weekly series centering on Dooley, a friendly alien who lands in the backyard of an Earth family and quickly makes friends with not only the family but the neighborhood children as well. The children become role models, demonstrating to young viewers the value of knowledge and learning. The series combines live action with 3D animation, talented children and dozens of original songs. The series is created on the premise that play enables children to grow socially, emotionall, intellectually and physically to their maximum potential."
6. "'Dooley and Pals' now on DVD: Emmy Award-winning show created by Greenwood native" (pages 1 and 2). The Index-Journal. 2005-09-04. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2023-03-28. Retrieved 2023-03-28 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: ""'Dooley and Pals' is unique as a series by its use of the principle of reinforcement," said Dr. Gordon Berry, Educational Consultant and Professor Emeritus at the Graduate School of Education, UCLA. "The life lessons in each episode will be carried throughout the show and then summarized in a distinct ending.""
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow The Dooley and Pals Show to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The amount of WP:RS WP:SIGCOV is sufficient to meet WP:GNG WP:NOTABILITY requirements for inclusion. The nature of coverage passes the WP:SIGCOV threshold, so the case cannot be made that coverage is WP:TRIVIAL or WP:ROUTINE, since it is significant and demonstrates WP:IMPACT, therefore justifying a standalone article. I also find that available sources are reliable and independent, removing any concerns about WP:PROMO. Since the subject is notable, WP:NOTABILITY criteria per WP:GNG are met. Additionally, there is plenty of SIGCOV to demonstrate the subject’s notability in a manner that satisfies the relevant guidelines for the subject. I would be more likely to push for deletion if the subject weren’t notable or if coverage was of a WP:ROUTINE/WP:TRIVIAL nature failing to meet WP:SIGCOV, but this simply isn’t the case because reliable independent sources effectively establish the subject’s WP:NOTABILITY. The case for deletion would be stronger if notability and significant coverage requirements weren’t satisfied. However, since they are satisfied, the stronger case to be made here is that for inclusion. For these reasons, keeping the article is the appropriate course of action. Deletion rationales pointing to a lack of RS SIGCOV don’t have much weight in this case, since the subject does have sufficient coverage of a significant nature by independent WP:RS. I will also point out that the subject meets WP:GNG requirements, as demonstrated by the available reliable sources which establish WP:NOTABILITY. Since all of these conditions are met, the article should be kept. Deletion would be more appropriate for an article on a subject without demonstrable notability via lack of adequate WP:RS WP:SIGCOV. Due to this subject’s notability, however, the article should not be considered eligible for deletion. Also, the nature of coverage passes the WP:SIGCOV threshold, so the case cannot be made that coverage is WP:TRIVIAL or WP:ROUTINE, since it is significant and demonstrates WP:IMPACT (i.e. this justifies a standalone article). I also find that available sources are reliable and independent, removing any concerns about WP:PROMO. Since the subject is notable, WP:NOTABILITY criteria per WP:GNG are met. Shawn Teller (hy/hym) (talk) 13:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.