Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dave Song

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW joe decker ^{talk to me} 04:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Dave Song[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod, a "song" quite literally made up in school one day. 28bytes (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is clear from the contents of the article that the song is not notable (nor does the article creator claim that it is). Should be eligible for speedy deletion, except there is no speedy criterion for this kind of article content. --bonadea contributions talk 16:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Doh5678 Talk 16:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sing along with me from St. Louis to Washington: Delete delete delete one more time delete! I just made that song up. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete frivolous non-sense. The kindergarten teacher must have left the room during nap time.--Hokeman (talk) 18:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this was not declined; the tag was removed by the author.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 19:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Bonadea. However, contrary to the statement above, the PROD was in fact declined, because the article creator removed the PROD tag (and he must have done so intentionally, because he has continued to edit the article). Anyone, even the article creator, has the right to decline a proposed deletion, per WP:CONTESTED. That said, this article obviously does not belong in an encyclopedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Bonadea. This is a useless article that should have been speedy deleted. Were the speedy deletion guys sleeping at the wheel?--tHeMaNe2 Talk 19:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A9 is only for musical recordings in the music branche, not for all songs. "This criterion does not apply to other forms of creative media, products, or any other types of articles. ". Regards.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 21:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no credible claim of notability. On the talk page it says "This is a small little song sang in our school. We will have students edit it later on. We ask that you do not delete it!" so maybe they intend to use this page to help teach the kids to edit Wikipedia, in which case it might be kind to the user to USERFY the page so the kids can edit it there, even though it has no hope of ever surviving in the mainspace. Just a thought. Robman94 (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ...can we please have a CSD criteria for WP:MADEUP ? --Anthem of joy (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment 1. This is TECHNICALLY a real song.

2. I guess it's too late anyway. 3. There is no notability CSD so that's off the table. 4. We will have to wait, sadly. I've been staring at this for days, day after day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themane2 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.