Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark Wielder
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Dark Wielder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be a non-notable comic. Google searches for the title of the comic and the author produce no meaningful hits. The username of the article creator may indicate self-promotion, also. The entire article is plot summary. Amazinglarry (talk) 02:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Karone The Spy, Gothica, HighMax, and Blood Romance are related pages that might also be included in this deletion listing. I'm not sure how to list multiple articles for deletion under one entry, though, so if someone could help me out I would appreciate it. Thanks. Amazinglarry (talk) 03:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I tried to chase the author on a few websites, but nothing came up that would make him a notable author. The comic itself couldn't be located either. Anyone else find the same thing?
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete either an outright hoax or a "Dude, I totally plan on doing this comic when I finish my social studies homework" sort of thing. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dude, totally delete as article has no reputable third-party sources saying this is notable. --Dragonfiend (talk) 16:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all this and the the related articles (listed in the template at the bottom of the page, which isn't actually a template, a small mercy as it means we can skip the TfD) lack of anything covering WP:N or even WP:V and no actual evidence this exists. (Emperor (talk) 16:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- Delete Couldn't find any good sources --Banime (talk) 23:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Obvious hoax - the supposed broadcast run goes through December of next year. Edward321 (talk) 03:56, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.