Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crystal Caravan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Crystal Caravan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not clear how this band meets notability guidelines. lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources.. Contested prod. Only claims a single recording on a non-notable label which was only recently released. Might be notable one day but not today. Both articles were created by a member of the band (see [1]) RadioFan (talk) 16:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following article about the only album from this band. It fails WP:NALBUMS and was also recently created by same editor:
- The Crystal Caravan (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —RadioFan (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —RadioFan (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Is this article a reliable source? Cunard (talk) 08:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The Music Street Journal doesn't appear to be much more than a well presented blog. Nearly all the reviews interviews and other content, including that article, there appears to be written by it's webmaster. So it represents just one man's opinion (though he seems to have a lot of opinions). The Music Street Journal itself has been cited a few times by other Wikipedia articles and I also see it's been referenced in news articles a couple times. Its a reasonable reference to use but doesn't do much to establish notability here. --RadioFan (talk) 12:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only source I found was the Music Street Journal article, which doesn't appear to establish notability. There are no other sources on Google News Archive or elsewhere, so this article should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.