Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Convent of Hell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 01:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Convent of Hell

There is no indicator of notability in this description of a recent ghost novel File Éireann 00:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No more than a synopsis of a wholly un-notable pornographic comic book.--Anthony.bradbury 00:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. And someone should look up synopsis before trying this sort of thing again. Tevildo 01:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article may qualify as a stub, but Wikipedia has lots of them; deletion seems overly harsh. It is verifiable, not a vanity page, nor original research. This comic might be somewhat obscure to the general public, but it is professionally published, still easily available for purchase nine years after it was first published, and widely reviewed by websites covering the genre, most of which make a point of saying it is notable for its controversial content and quality artwork. And, yes the synopsis is rather detailed, but no moreso than plenty of others on Wikipedia. Klope680 03:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. If evidence of notability is provided, then the article should stay. And, in that case, I'll be more than happy to edit down the synopsis to something more reasonable. Tevildo 14:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This seems to be a notable book. --DaveG12345 03:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.