Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Code Lyoko characters 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY KEEP, not actually a deletion request. I'll be watching these closely, though. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 20:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The Code Lyoko characters 2

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/The Code Lyoko characters
• Articles for deletion/The Code Lyoko characters 2

Odd Della Robbia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Aelita Hopper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

As suggested in the edit warring noticeboard, I am nominating these two articles for deletion because they were already merged at AfD. An editor disagrees with the merger, and two sets of edit wars later he simply cannot be swayed from the position that he must be right. The articles are in no better a state than they were when they were merged, just worded differently. As he admits on Talk:Odd Della Robbia, the current state of the article is all he plans to make of it. I've tried to point him to a featured article for an example of how it should look to no avail. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

• Procedural Keep – this is what dispute resolution is for. May I suggest a request for comment or possibly informal mediation instead of another AFD? Also, no one has looked for any input from WP:FRANCE or WP:TELEVISION; that should at least be tried, first. MuZemike 01:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - main character from a highly popular tv series, and also, i never said this was all i was ever going to do with it, i said thats all i had for now on odd's page, aelita's is still being worked on, i said with oddd that if it needed more i would try to expand it. get your facts straight Jeremie Belpois (talk) 01:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.