Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Christmas Tree (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Christmas Tree (film)[edit]

No notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Films starring major stars are inherently notable. AnyPerson (talk) 06:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No they aren't. Try checking WP:NF. TJ Spyke 06:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try evidence of notability point 2 in that page: "The film features significant involvement (ie. one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career." Directorial debuts as suggested below are a major part of someone's career. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - Is it notable for being Sally Field's directorial debut? Do these sources count as notable coverage? - [1], [2] AnyPerson (talk) 06:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly written, unsourced, not indications of notability. TJ Spyke 06:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, as per User:AnyPerson. Appears incredibly sloppy, but notable. Suggest flag for rescue, if it's that important. Aurush kazemini^talk 06:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AnyPerson found significant coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacGyverMagic (talk • contribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 11:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand per AnyPerson's sources, notability is asserted through coverage in said sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per guideline as explained by Mgm and sources as found by AnyPerson. With respects to TJSpyke, and since notability has been shown, being poorly written or unsourced is a reason for WP:CLEANUP, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: and since I last visited this AfD, I took it upon myself to straighten out the article, cleaning it up per film MOS and sourcing it being Sally Fields' television film directorial debut. It has had international release in multiple languages and had been released on VHS back in 2001. Its now a definite keeper. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.}

Weak Delete Not notable. The Rolling Camel (talk) 10:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now sourced, notable for directoral debut, international release. Skier Dude (talk) 07:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – some good sources, major movie. TheAE talk/sign 07:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep per above. The Rolling Camel (talk) 11:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.