Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chinese in Latin America and the Caribbean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 19:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Chinese in Latin America and the Caribbean[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article about a book that does not fulfil the criteria of WP:BK --Caorongjin (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - WP:BK point 1 wants two or more non-trival reviews, which this appears to have: one in the references, one in the further reading. There is also another review here, which is a duplicate from another location. The quality of the article isn't great, but it satisfies the keep requirements. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes criteria 1. of WP:NB. The book is the centre of discussion of main subject in one reference and also got a featured review. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 11:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG, in addition to the book reviews cited, here are a couple more: in Asian Ethnicity - Book Reviews: The Chinese in Latin America and the Caribbean, edited by Walton Look Lai and Tan Chee-Beng, and in International Review of Social History - Review: Plantations and Labour in the Caribbean in the Long Nineteenth Century, its also well known being held by over 1000 libraries worldwide. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notable per Nosebagbear and Coolabahapple. James500 (talk) 22:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK Atlantic306 (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.