Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Challenges Game System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Challenges Game System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any reviews or in-depth mentions of this niche game (there are some a few esoteric blog posts like [1] but blogs are not RS). One reliable book source is cited in the article, but it is not online; in either case a single source is not enough for WP:GNG nor NBOOK, and given that it is used for a simple factoid (designed by... published in...) there is no reason to assume the coverage in Schick (1991) is in-depth. We are not a catalogue of all games or such. At best I think this can redirect to Tom Moldvay, where the game is mentioned (and the Schick ref can be copied there). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom or redirect to creator Tom Moldvay. A mention on one page of a book is inadequate to establish notability, as are the aforementioned blog posts. Note also that several who commented on those blogs mentioned they had never heard of the subject. Damon Killian (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.