Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Caswell Messenger
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 09:40, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Caswell Messenger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A small local newspaper from Caswell County, NC, not notable by any stretch of the imagination. Article is orphan since 2009 and a short stub. I have added a mention to the article on Caswell County so what is useful from here has already been merged. Jpacobb (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - There is much to be added to this article, but there seems to be no reason to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uberaccount (talk • contribs) 03:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, good deal of coverage in secondary sources, specifically, books. — Cirt (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; significant coverage in secondary sources per Cirt. —Theopolisme (talk) 01:10, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – SJ + 02:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.