Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cannigma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Cannigma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet NCORP. The only citations that are nominally independent do not provide the in-depth coverage or intellectual independence that is expected for notability. (t · c) buidhe 08:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 08:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 08:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not significant. Free1Soul (talk) 17:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. I have been unable to find any references that meet NCORP criteria, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 22:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.