Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Boutique Wine Company
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 01:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Simply put, blatant advertising. Delete TheRingess 06:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Royboycrashfan 07:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Dlete., yes ad. Jawz 08:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- TheRingess, I fail to see how this entry is any more an advert than Kmart Australia. If you are prepared to delete this entry, then you really should delete the entire Retail companies of Australia category. Dally Horton 08:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply That kind of argument does not hold water with me. Every article in Wikipedia deserves to be judged on its own merits.TheRingess 14:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is verifiable third party sources about K-mart Australia. Alas, I don't know the same can be said about the Boutique Wine Company. 1,990 Google results for "Boutique Wine Company" but many are about other boutique wineries.[1].A Google News story proved fruitless. A search of Australian news stories came up with nothing about this company. Capitalistroadster 09:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This article is acceptable as other companies in Australia but it needs time to develop. --Bduke 09:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Random online store. Ambi 09:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only notable online Australian wine store I can think of is Vintage Cellars.--cj | talk 11:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 09:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)"[reply]
- Delete Advertising, nothing else. (aeropagitica) 17:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--nixie 23:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advertising of nn business. Sarah Ewart 00:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - advert. Latinus 22:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for being so quick to jump down my throat. You might try offering some constructive criticism perhaps? If I need some verifiable third party sources, that’s fine. Dally Horton 04:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's just not important enough - it's a random online store. This is an encyclopedia, not the Yellow Pages, and while we're (justifiably) very lenient with notability, we do have our limits. Ambi 05:17, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.