Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bottle Flipping Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bottle Flipping Game

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a clear case of madeupitis. I can't find a good speedy rationale for this purpose beyond WP:SNOW, so here we are. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious delete per WP:NFT -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this with fire! Gatemansgc (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, come on, it says "This game is not made up", so it must be for real :-) But seriously, Delete, as it really is just made up and unreferenced. -- Boing! said Zebedee 15:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, which this very clearly seems to be, plus zero coverage in reliable sources makes it unverifiable.--Beloved Freak 16:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:MADEUP. PDCook (talk) 16:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Based on the description, made up on a day where everyone was really bored. Apparently no reward for somehow flipping a bottle and having it land and stay upright on a table, but it promises plenty of pinky injuries for failure, and possibly some from broken glass, or the downstairs neighbor complaining about the noise. It ought to be the other way around-- employ the rules of spin the bottle if the bottle lands on its side, and if it happens to land upright, "game over". Mandsford (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 23:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: for making me lose The Game again. Seriously, though, short of AfD you might consider wp:prod for cases like this - essentially uncontroversial, but doesn't fit in any csd bucket. ErikHaugen (talk) 01:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Should have been Speedy deleted, IMHO... TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.