Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bop House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bop House

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The house itself fails WP:GNG. Some of the sources listed in the article isn't even RS, Google News yield none RS sources. Though IDK if Elle or this Yahoo Entertainment article is RS? Nonetheless, it still fails WP:SIGCOV Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - references themselves don't seem to stand up to WP:SIGCOV, but could probably be redirected to Content house. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think a redirect would be particularly useful here, unless every non-notable content house deserves a redirect to Content house. --Richard Yin (talk) 08:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The majority of the sources in the article are unreliable (Know Your Meme, Urban Dictionary, WikiHow, YouTube, etc.) and furthermore do not demonstrate significant coverage. Madeleine (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.