Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Body (Into the Dark)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If people want it to be userfied they can ask at WP:REFUND; I won't userfy without an username. Draftification at administrator discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:05, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Body (Into the Dark)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems premature for an episode of a television series to exist when the series has yet to premiere especially in the situation where all coverage of said episode is about the series in general. The article as it exists is a lightly sourced stub that fails WP:NTV and WP:TVEP. Yes we have individual entries for individual episodes of other TV shows but, per WP:OTHERSTUFF, that does not mean that this article needs to exist. It may very well be the case that the an article will be warranted for this episode eventually but now does not seem to be the time. BoogerD (talk) 02:09, 27 August 2018 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because [for the same issues listed above]:[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict6 9 03:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both Wait for the show to premiere before creating an article, and see if it gets enough critical acclaim to exist as a separate article. Nate • (chatter) 03:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy both until episodes have been released and hsve rs coverage, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 13:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete / Move to draftspace: These articles do not currently justify their existence, even if the content they haven't wasn't already at the series article. Users are welcome to work on such articles in draft situation, but they shouldn't be actual articles like this yet. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.