Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bloody Fists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bloody Fists

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Cannot find reliable sources for establishing notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 18:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mz7 (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Mz7 (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. You would think, with a notable director, stars, and choreographer, that there would be some coverage out there. But since this was released in the 1970s it may be hard to find online. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sources are available, not sure how good they are: this one and this bit about banned/unrated films. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think the Time Out one is short but still good. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Keep because there are a few results in Google Books when I search for this film. One book, Hong Kong Action Cinema, says, "His first hit was the widely distributed Bloody Fists." The book Films of Fury: The Kung Fu Movie Book calls this film "an independent produced milestone". I agree with Anachronist that online coverage would be difficult to find, but it does not mean that the topic is not notable. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Encyclopedia of Martial Arts Movies has this entry for the film here. Last paragraph is good out-of-universe background information. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've implemented in the article the sources mentioned in this discussion. I'm fine with keeping it now. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in light of Erik's expansion of content and references. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NFILM.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.