Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blockbuster Buster
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Channel Awesome#The Blockbuster Buster. MBisanz talk 13:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- The Blockbuster Buster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. No sources listed. Article is about a vaguely known online personality who hasn't made any claim to noteritity. Just like JonTron, except JonTron has potential to become notable. This guy doesn't. Rusted AutoParts 16:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Channel Awesome#The Blockbuster Buster Outside of CA, very non-notable reviewer without much reach outside that website. I would hold no prejudice to a full deletion if that's not satisfactory (the CA article writing on him is puffier than Lorelai Gilmore's blue jacket). Nate • (chatter) 05:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.