Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blissfits In Action

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Blissfits In Action

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "team" is a short lived collaboration between two wrestlers and has not actually ever been billed as "The Blissfits In Action", which seems to be a fan creation. While each member of the team is certainly notable, the two-three week old "team" is in no way notable. This seems like it should be a section in the respective articles at most. The even invents tag team finishing moves when the duo has never won a match and thus never "finished" anyone with it. The definition of Fancruft. MPJ-DK 02:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero results in search for "The Blissfits in Action" while search for "The Blissfits" finds a different group (musical). Not notable. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yet another short lived tag team with zero notability.★Trekker (talk) 10:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Is anyone else getting the distinct impression that the article creator has been utilizing a ip to try to screw with the deletions of their articles. I certainly am.★Trekker (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and it's WP:TOOSOON. Nickag989^talk 12:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above; not notable. Much of the info (especially moves) is WP:OR. Sekyaw (talk) 23:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.