Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Eyed Peas forthcoming album
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Black Eyed Peas forthcoming album (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Blatant crystalballery and rumour-mongering. Fails WP:V, Wikipedia:MUSIC#Albums. Contested prod. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The E.N.D. (The Energy Never Dies) (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The E.N.D. (The Energy Never Dies) (3rd nomination) and arguments presented therein. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice. It's hammer time. (Oh, and per WP:MUSIC#ALBUMS too.) - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:HAMMER Sceptre (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. STOP! etc. tomasz. 18:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL/WP:HAMMER. At this point, writing an article about this is still speculation. Besides, half of the content is made up of rumors. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 18:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:HAMMER. I'm pleased to see that's really gaining popularity. Seriously, there's nothing here but rumor mongering. Stop it before it spreads. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 18:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:HAMMER, and all those other ones we quote from in times like these. Good on ya TPH. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 18:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Make the article when we actually can reference the album's name with a reliable citation, and have some references, not just babbling speculation. IceUnshattered (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.