Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Best of Dino Dvornik: Vidi ove Pisme (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dino Dvornik. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 16:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Best of Dino Dvornik: Vidi ove Pisme[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NALBUMS nothing but a track listing which can be merged to main article if notable enough Oo7565 (talk) 07:30, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dino Dvornik as failing WP:V (and redirects are cheap), or Delete for same reason, if consensus leans towards delete. Zero sources for ~a year. It seems from the first AfD that the tracklisting is unwanted in the main article, so I see no justification for a merge. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 14:19, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per AbsolutDan --Tmckeage (talk) 07:28, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.