Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bernasconi
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The Bernasconi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable cocktail, unsupported assertions, unreferenced, fails WP:GNG. Contested prod. WWGB (talk) 03:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 03:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 03:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails notability. I'm tempted to say this should be speedy deleted as a blatant hoax. JoelWhy?(talk) 12:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I find nothing referencing a cocktail of this name in gNews or gBook searches. Fails notability standards. Could this be made up? Geoff Who, me? 01:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Don't know if this is a hoax but it doesn't appear verifiable or notable. --Artene50 (talk) 04:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.