Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beast Legion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy to User:Apokryltaros/The Beast Legion, per WP:TOOSOON. (non-admin closure) -- Trevj (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Beast Legion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this since it was recently added to the webcomics list and after doing a search, I was unable to really find any reliable sources to show that this passes WP:WEB. It won an award at a comic book convention in India, but I can't find anything to back that up other than WP:PRIMARY sources. There isn't a record of this on the actual webcomic's website at all, nor of any of the previous winners of anything else that they've given awards out for. On a side note, the comic book convention started in 2011 and while it would potentially contribute to notability enough to where I decided not to speedy it, it doesn't appear to be a big or notable enough award to justify keeping it based solely on that fact. I know this was just created a few days ago and I have no problem with one of the two users that worked on the entry userfying it, but this appears to be your typical webcomic that is somewhat popular but lacks coverage in RS enough to warrant an entry at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 09:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:32, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy for now - It appears the comic was started in 2010 and received the Comic Con award last year so it's probably too soon. A Google News and Books search provided nothing relevant and my own search only provided one blog. SwisterTwister talk 21:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.