Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Baka Boyz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 21:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Baka Boyz

First AfD was closed as delete, but many sources had been added near the end of the discussion. As a result I'm relisting it to see if this new version is notable. Procedural nom. Wizardman 16:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment here are the sources from the previous Afd. SunCreator (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - happy with notability. SunCreator (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Could use a copy edit and expansion, but the sources are sufficient to establish notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears notable to me, needs some cleanup, but at least there are some decent 3rd party references.--Rtphokie (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article could use some work but it's well-referenced and certainly appears to satisfy any notability requirements. - Dravecky (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Dravecky (talk) 20:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good call by the nominator to give the article a relist rather than immediately deleting, as it appears to work in terms of sourcing and notability. 23skidoo (talk) 22:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my comments in the first AfD. Question: should this be renamed to just "Baka Boyz"? DHowell (talk) 05:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Their AM show may not be that well known outside of their home market, but their syndicated weekend mixshow has numerous affiliates nationwide and in decent sized markets. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 21:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.