Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Audrey Hepburn Story
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Mo0[talk] 01:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable movie. Even IMdB pans it. Delete Atrian 21:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. How good a movie is is not a criterion for deletion. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep and expand. Quality of the film is not a criteria. Film is notable for its subject matter, alone. 23skidoo 01:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep obviously. Eusebeus 03:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This is not a speedy keep. A speedy keep can only occur if the nomination was obviously in bad faith or disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, or if the nominator withdraws and there are no votes to delete. Neither of these have happened. Stifle 11:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User:Zoe and others. -- JJay 03:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I've cleaned it up. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 05:06Z
- Keep CalJW 14:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. any made-for-tv movie that aired in primetime is notable. Kingturtle 20:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Being in the IMDB is enough. Durova 20:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.