Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Attraction: Heavens and Earth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Astrofaes. Redirecting as an editorial decision. Consider this a no consensus close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Attraction: Heavens and Earth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. While the sources provided show that it probably exists, they are not clearly credible, nor do they show notability. Furthermore, release was on two redlink record labels. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It does not matter if the two labels that did the re-issues were red links, that just means that no one has taken the time to create an article for them. Who knows, those labels might be notable, it's just no one has taken the time to prove it. I think that since this record has been re-released as many times as it has, that you are bound to over look sources from a simple Google search. Some sites even have the re-issue still around, and when people like Hell's Headbangers still have this release, it's bound to turn up in other sources. (I just have not had the time to go look for them right at the moment.) Basically, I'm saying this: You nominated a release for deletion based on it being a demo. This particular release has been re-released on multiple labels, and distributed through major labels. (See aforementioned link) Keep for now, give it some time to grow a bit source wise. Undead Warrior (talk) 06:08, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The album being re-released does not make it pass WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 02:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.