Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Art of Speech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Speech Debelle. JForget 00:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Art of Speech[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one is a slam dunk case of WP:HAMMER and WP:CRYSTAL. Previous PROD (by me) was removed by an anonymous IP editor without comment or improvement to the article. By the way, I see no problem with mentioning at the artist's article that a new album is in the works. But what's known about the album now is not even close to what is required for an album article. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:16, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:17, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Speech Debelle for now. Not enough is known about the subject for it to warrant an encyclopedia page. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:55, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Speech Debelle per nom and Richard. The artist made mention of this being the title of her next album in an interview last November, and it's apparently going to be released "in the not-too-distant future" as of last week, but there's nowhere near enough to justify a stand-alone article for it. Cliff smith ^talk 04:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.