Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Art of Cricket (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Art of Cricket (video game)[edit]

Article was created in October 2006 with a promise that this computer game was being released in "mid-2007". Its still not here, so this falls into crystal ballery, and there's no reliable secondary sources to explain why it would be notable even if it was here. Article is clearly promotional and the subject is unencyclopaedic. —Moondyne 16:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if reworded. There is a comment on the "official website" claiming that the project was delayed because the developers had "difficulties with his personal life." -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 16:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not for crystal ballery but as non-notable in light of absolutely no independent coverage. Maralia (talk) 19:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete must agree with Maralia - clearly non-notable. Tim Ross·^talk 22:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is nothing stopping anyone recreating the article if and when the game is released and some reliable sources are provided. —Moondyne 23:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable game with no secondary sources to speak of, googling the game's name along with windows (the platform) and the developer name (vengeance games) brings up 4 results, one is WP, one is the game's own website, the other two look to be WP mirrors. The article itself is soap-boxy and promotional, the list of features looks like a copy and paste job. Sails close to vanispamcruftvertisement.Someone another (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as completely unsourced crystal ballery. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.