Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ars Supernova
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite 17:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Ars Supernova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Band with no evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC. Most sources appear to be local "scene"-type media, blogs, etc., that do not meet WP:RS, and other references do not indicate why band is notable for its music. Albums appear self-published, no tours, etc. Also appears to attempt to assert notability as a philanthropic group, but fails notability guidelines in that regard as well. --Kinu t/c 04:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 04:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom's explanation, which are my findings as well. Sources seem limited to a local newspaper, an write-up in a university paper, and a few blogs. Does not appear to meet the criteria of WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 18:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm unable to find anything that establishes how they meet WP:BAND. Nuttah (talk) 10:17, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.